So, my last post was a reflection on how I often assign ‘alt-assignments’ to students without actually experiencing them myself, so today I will both practice what I preach and also try and put to paper the intense morning I had at ISA2017.
But first, some background. In my 4th year Critical Peace Studies class, we engage in a class project where the goal is some kind of public engagement/activism. My students get to choose what the project will be, how it will unfold, even the deadlines. The students also set their own ‘learning outcomes’ for the project and these include some activist goals of engaging with the public, changing (mis)perceptions people have about violence, confronting what they see as dangerous ‘echo chambers’ and a growing lack of civility in public discourse.
Of course, I haven’given complete control of the course over to the students, and I have set a final assignment for the course which requires them to reflect on the class project. One of the writing prompts they are given is to reflect on the opportunities, benefits, roadblocks and dilemmas of activist-scholarship. I guess what I’m looking for them to think about are issues such as ‘Is there a trade off between academic rigor when trying to make our work public facing?’ ‘Do we lose our objectivity when we engage in activist-scholarship?’ ‘What are the dangers to the scholar, professional or personal, in undertaking activism within their professional life’?
So, in the spirit of walking in my students’ shoes, I’d like to reflect on my morning of activist scholarship.
First up was an 8:15 panel on Everyday Sexism and Allyship in our profession– where female and male scholars discussed sexism, harassment and even assault that many of us face in the carrying out of our professional duties. The focus, however, was activist— what can and should we do? Solutions came in two forms. First, institutionally: strengthen and contribute to unions within the university; get yourselves into positions of power to change the structure; reach out to your professional associations for support and work to strengthen these as well; the list went on. Second– we need to change academic culture; scholars who are known to be predatory should not be invited to panels/prestigious speaking engagements (we should not normalize their behavior), we should model healthy networking and mentorship; we should investigate and promote the ‘slow scholarship’ movement, the list went on.
Following this panel, I rushed off to a Flash Mob to show solidarity with scholars who could not or would not attend ISA because of the recent executive order, the problem of getting a visa, fears over personal safety etc. We stood for 15 minutes in the lobby holding up our passports, which symbolized our privileged mobility which is not enjoyed by all of our colleagues and is a threat to academic freedom.
So what of my activist morning at what is primarily a conference to showcase your research? Well, first, it was personally and professionally fulfilling. The morning has left me feeling energized, connected and empowered to carry on with my academic duties, which (formally) in my case has at times included serving on an Equity and Diversity Committee, Wellness Committee and (informally) involves mentoring/supporting colleagues and students as they navigate academic life alongside me. I also feel, that in regards to the flash mob, I am engaged in academic citizenship that is needed to protect academic freedom. Therefore, on one level I feel this was ‘all in a days work’.
However, there are of course creeping insecurities that plagued my morning. Will this roundtable ‘count’ for anything on my CV in terms of tenure and promotion? Is ‘challenging the system’ really what my institution has in mind when they ask for evidence of ‘academic leadership’ as part of my tenure and promotion file? Would my time not have been better spent writing up another paper on my research findings on active learning, or pushing myself to produce another paper on pacifism?
Beyond this issue of ‘production/good use of time’, I found myself strangely worried about reputational issues. In particular, there are now a good number of photos of me flashmobbing on Twitter. Yes, we’ve received a lot of support, but does such activism potentially lead to me not being seen as a ‘serious academic’ (to use a phrase popularized and mocked on Twitter recently)? Is my activism welcomed by my colleagues, or will whispers ensue about my activism that paint me as someone who wastes time (and travel funds) to engage in such work? And then, the human being in me (which does not always agree with the academic in me) scolds myself for being so selfish as to put my concerns about myself above those in need.
Now of course, I haven’t just engaged in activist-scholarship this week. I did present a research paper and I was a discussant for another panel where I commented on three other research papers (the traditional conference activities). So, I am left wondering about my insecurities, whether these are legitimate concerns or I am just being hyper-paranoid. Thinking through all of this, I’ll be seeking out guidance and advice from colleagues at my own institution on how (if?) I can be a successful activist-scholar at my institution. What are my options? How/should I think about balance? What are the costs/are there costs? Being proactive about my concerns of activist scholarship will hopefully leave me in a much stronger position to strengthen my profile on all fronts. I also hope that my own (brief) working through of some of the dilemmas presented above will also help facilitate my students own thinking on their first foray into activist-scholarship.